People v. Bozeman

2018 NY Slip Op 986
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 2018
Docket143 KA 17-01295
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 986 (People v. Bozeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bozeman, 2018 NY Slip Op 986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Bozeman (2018 NY Slip Op 00986)
People v Bozeman
2018 NY Slip Op 00986
Decided on February 9, 2018
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 9, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

143 KA 17-01295

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

WILLIE BOZEMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THOMAS J. EOANNOU, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (JULIE BENDER FISKE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), rendered January 12, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted assault in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.10 [1]). Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that his waiver of the right to appeal was made "knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily" (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). Inasmuch as defendant's valid waiver encompasses both his conviction and his sentence, defendant is foreclosed from challenging the severity of his sentence on appeal (see id. at 255-256; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; People v Walker, 151 AD3d 1730, 1731 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1135 [2017]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]).

Entered: February 9, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Walker
2017 NY Slip Op 4683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Maracle
973 N.E.2d 1272 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bozeman-nyappdiv-2018.