People v. Bozak
This text of 29 Misc. 3d 711 (People v. Bozak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Troy City Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Defendant seeks dismissal of a traffic ticket which alleges “Talking on Mobile Device While Driving” in violation of section 1225-c (2) (a) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law on May 30, 2010. Defendant argues that his use of a handheld amateur [712]*712radio does not fit the definition of a mobile telephone and as such the present charge should be dismissed. The People have not submitted a response in opposition.
The Vehicle and Traffic Law defines “Mobile telephone” as a “device used by subscribers and other users of wireless telephone service to access such service” (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c [1] [a]). “Wireless telephone service” is defined as “two-way real time voice telecommunications service that is interconnected to a public switched telephone network and is provided by a commercial mobile radio service, as such term is defined by 47 C.F.R. § 20.3” (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c [1] [b] [emphasis added]). A review of 47 CFR 20.3 reveals that Citizens Band Radio Service is defined under private mobile radio service, not commercial mobile radio service. Therefore, the court finds that the use of an amateur radio device does not fit the definition of a mobile telephone as defined under the Vehicle and Traffic Law and grants the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 Misc. 3d 711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bozak-nytroycityct-2010.