People v. Boyle

California Supreme Court

People v. Boyle

116 Cal. 658

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedMay 6, 1897

DocketCrim. No. 235

StatusPublished

This text of 116 Cal. 658 (People v. Boyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Boyle, 116 Cal. 658 (Cal. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court.

The defendant was convicted of a felony, technically designated in the information as an assault with intent to commit the infamous crime against nature. He appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. The facts of the case do not make out the offense of which the defendant has been convicted. It has been so held in at least two cases. (See Prindle v. State, 31 Tex. Crim. Rep. 551; 37 Am. St. Rep. 833; 1 Wharton on Criminal Law, sec. 575.)

Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court.

The defendant was convicted of a felony, technically designated in the information as an assault with intent to commit the infamous crime against nature. He appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. The facts of the case do not make out the offense of which the defendant has been convicted. It has been so held in at least two cases. (See Prindle v. State, 31 Tex. Crim. Rep. 551; 37 Am. St. Rep. 833; 1 Wharton on Criminal Law, sec. 575.)

Judgment and order reversed and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 Cal. 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-boyle-cal-1897.