People v. Boyd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Boyd

159 A.D.2d 455, 554 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3096

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.D.2d 455 (People v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Boyd, 159 A.D.2d 455, 554 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dennis Edwards, Jr., J.), rendered on October 1, 1987, convicting defendant after a jury trial of one count of attempted rape in the first degree and one count of sexual abuse in the first degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 5 to 15 years on the attempted rape count and 2Ys to 7 years on the sexual abuse count, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dennis Edwards, Jr., J.), rendered on October 1, 1987, convicting defendant after a jury trial of one count of attempted rape in the first degree and one count of sexual abuse in the first degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 5 to 15 years on the attempted rape count and 2Ys to 7 years on the sexual abuse count, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 A.D.2d 455, 554 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-boyd-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack