People v. Boyd

California Court of Appeal

People v. Boyd

228 Cal. App. 2d 844, 39 Cal. Rptr. 693, 1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1149

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 29, 1964

DocketCrim. No. 7859

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 228 Cal. App. 2d 844 (People v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Boyd, 228 Cal. App. 2d 844, 39 Cal. Rptr. 693, 1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1149 (Cal. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

WOOD, P. J.

The judgments of the trial court in the two cases involved herein, made on June 7, 1961 (upon verdict finding defendant guilty on two counts of unlawfully selling marijuana, and upon order revoking probation), were affirmed by this court in an opinion filed on May 8, 1962. (People v. Boyd, 203 Cal.App.2d 348 [21 Cal.Rptr. 444].) Thereafter, pursuant to the decision in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 [83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811], and on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, this court recalled the remittitur herein, vacated the judgment of May 8, 1962, and appointed Mr. Raymond Gloozman as counsel for defendant. (The defendant had appeared previously in propria persona.)

The facts of the eases and the contentions on appeal are stated in the former opinion. No useful purpose will be served by repeating what was said therein, and this court adopts, by reference, as its opinion herein the former opinion in People v. Boyd, 203 Cal.App.2d 348 [21 Cal.Rptr. 444].

The judgments are affirmed.

Fourt, J., and Lillie, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOOD, P. J.

The judgments of the trial court in the two cases involved herein, made on June 7, 1961 (upon verdict finding defendant guilty on two counts of unlawfully selling marijuana, and upon order revoking probation), were affirmed by this court in an opinion filed on May 8, 1962. (People v. Boyd, 203 Cal.App.2d 348 [21 Cal.Rptr. 444].) Thereafter, pursuant to the decision in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 [83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811], and on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, this court recalled the remittitur herein, vacated the judgment of May 8, 1962, and appointed Mr. Raymond Gloozman as counsel for defendant. (The defendant had appeared previously in propria persona.)

The facts of the eases and the contentions on appeal are stated in the former opinion. No useful purpose will be served by repeating what was said therein, and this court adopts, by reference, as its opinion herein the former opinion in People v. Boyd, 203 Cal.App.2d 348 [21 Cal.Rptr. 444].

The judgments are affirmed.

Fourt, J., and Lillie, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 Cal. App. 2d 844, 39 Cal. Rptr. 693, 1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-boyd-calctapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack