People v. Bowman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bowman

122 A.D.2d 65, 504 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59129

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 A.D.2d 65 (People v. Bowman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bowman, 122 A.D.2d 65, 504 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.), rendered February 17, 1984, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

While the record discloses that the People failed to comply with Penal Law § 450.10, such noncompliance was not in bad faith and did not prejudice the defendant. Therefore, dismissal of the indictment or modification of the judgment is not warranted (see, People v Angelo, 93 AD2d 264; People v Washington, 110 AD2d 797; People v Lopez, 123 Misc 2d 134). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.), rendered February 17, 1984, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

While the record discloses that the People failed to comply with Penal Law § 450.10, such noncompliance was not in bad faith and did not prejudice the defendant. Therefore, dismissal of the indictment or modification of the judgment is not warranted (see, People v Angelo, 93 AD2d 264; People v Washington, 110 AD2d 797; People v Lopez, 123 Misc 2d 134). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 65, 504 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bowman-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack