People v. Bowerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bowerman

25 A.D.2d 731, 269 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4472

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 731 (People v. Bowerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bowerman, 25 A.D.2d 731, 269 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant’s appeal from judgment of conviction, after jury trial, rendered October 30, 1963, for assault in the second degree and criminally carrying a loaded weapon, is held in abeyance. The ease is otherwise remanded to the Supreme Court, New York County, before Dickens, J., for a hearing and determination (with findings of fact and conclusions of law) on the issue of the voluntariness of defendant’s admissions which were received in evidence at the trial (see People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72). At such hearing the defendant and the People are permitted to put in additional proof on the issue of voluntariness if so desired.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant’s appeal from judgment of conviction, after jury trial, rendered October 30, 1963, for assault in the second degree and criminally carrying a loaded weapon, is held in abeyance. The ease is otherwise remanded to the Supreme Court, New York County, before Dickens, J., for a hearing and determination (with findings of fact and conclusions of law) on the issue of the voluntariness of defendant’s admissions which were received in evidence at the trial (see People v. Huntley, 15 N Y 2d 72). At such hearing the defendant and the People are permitted to put in additional proof on the issue of voluntariness if so desired.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 731, 269 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bowerman-nyappdiv-1966.