People v. Bowens

2025 NY Slip Op 02016
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 3, 2025
DocketInd No. 828/17; Appeal No. 4035; Case No. 2019-05413
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 02016 (People v. Bowens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bowens, 2025 NY Slip Op 02016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Bowens (2025 NY Slip Op 02016)
People v Bowens
2025 NY Slip Op 02016
Decided on April 03, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 03, 2025
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Moulton, Gesmer, Pitt-Burke, Michael, JJ.

Ind No. 828/17|Appeal No. 4035|Case No. 2019-05413|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Kilrail Bowens, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Frank Xiao of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Faith DiTrolio of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Mandelbaum, J.), rendered March 29, 2019, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees and three counts of criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's argument that the undercover officer had no recollection of three of the charged drug sales and therefore that the verdicts as to these counts were against the weight of the evidence finds no support in the record. The record shows that the undercover officer testified credibly and in detail after refreshing her recollection (see People v Boyd , 58 NY2d 1016, 1018 [1983]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 3, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Boyd
448 N.E.2d 1346 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 02016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bowens-nyappdiv-2025.