People v. Bowens
This text of 288 A.D.2d 232 (People v. Bowens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens Comity (McDonald, J.), rendered June 24, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the unsigned affidavit at issue was not Rosario material (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, cert denied 368 US 866; People v Robles, 210 AD2d 264; CPL 240.44 [1]). In any event, the defendant failed to demonstrate that there was a reasonable possibility that the initial non-disclosure of the unsigned affidavit materially contributed to the result of the trial or suppression hearing (see, CPL 240.75; People v Small, 286 AD2d 513; People v Sorbello, 285 AD2d 88; People v Wolf, 284 AD2d 102). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, S. Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 A.D.2d 232, 732 N.Y.S.2d 372, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bowens-nyappdiv-2001.