People v. Bowen
49 Cal. 654
Opinion
At the trial, the Court allowed the prosecution, against defendant’s objection, to introduce in evidence the declarations of defendant concerning his misconduct with other young girls. The Attorney-General admits that this was error, and we agree with the Attorney-General.
Judgment and order denying a new trial reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Bowen, 49 Cal. 654 (Cal. 1875).
49 Cal. 654 (People v. Bowen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Brown
163 P.2d 85 (California Court of Appeal, 1945)
People v. Asavis
71 P.2d 307 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
People v. Wyett
193 P. 153 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Hall v. United States
235 F. 869 (Ninth Circuit, 1916)
People v. Letoile
159 P. 1057 (California Court of Appeal, 1916)
State v. Williams
103 P. 250 (Utah Supreme Court, 1909)
People v. Stewart
24 P. 722 (California Supreme Court, 1890)