People v. Boujet

Criminal Court of the City of New York

People v. Boujet

2 Park. Cr. 11

CourtCriminal Court of the City of New York

DecidedJuly 4, 1823

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Park. Cr. 11 (People v. Boujet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Criminal Court of the City of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Boujet, 2 Park. Cr. 11 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1823).

Pincite

Opinion

Walworth, Circuit Judge.

Under the circumstances of this case, there is sufficient proof of the identity of the articles, con[12]*12nected with the confessions of the prisoner, to prove that the felony was committed, without producing the son of Dewey, who took the gun and hat from Nichols and delivered them to his father. The breaking and entering the house by Moran, was in law a breaking and entering by both; and the prisoner is guilty of burglary as much as if'he had -entered in person and stolen the goods.

Prisoner convicted of burglary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walworth, Circuit Judge.

Under the circumstances of this case, there is sufficient proof of the identity of the articles, con[12]*12nected with the confessions of the prisoner, to prove that the felony was committed, without producing the son of Dewey, who took the gun and hat from Nichols and delivered them to his father. The breaking and entering the house by Moran, was in law a breaking and entering by both; and the prisoner is guilty of burglary as much as if'he had -entered in person and stolen the goods.

Prisoner convicted of burglary.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Park. Cr. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-boujet-nycrimct-1823.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack