People v. Boston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Boston

1 A.D.2d 443, 766 N.Y.S.2d 894

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Boston. Read the opinion of the Court — 296 A.D.2d 576 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 2003·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered February 10, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A review of the record of the plea proceeding reflects that the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see People v Hickman, 276 AD2d 563, 564 [2000]; People v Mann, 258 AD2d 738, 739 [1999]). Smith, J.E, McGinity, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), rendered February 10, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A review of the record of the plea proceeding reflects that the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see People v Hickman, 276 AD2d 563, 564 [2000]; People v Mann, 258 AD2d 738, 739 [1999]). Smith, J.E, McGinity, H. Miller and Rivera, JJ., concur.

People v. Boston, 1 A.D.2d 443, 766 N.Y.S.2d 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

1 A.D.2d 443 (People v. Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related