People v. Bostic
This text of 125 A.D.3d 992 (People v. Bostic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed May 18, 2011, upon his conviction of attempted arson in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal does not bar review of the sentence that was ultimately imposed (see People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 927 [2012]; People v Arney, 120 AD3d 949 [2014]). Nonetheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Dickerson and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 A.D.3d 992, 1 N.Y.S.3d 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bostic-nyappdiv-2015.