People v. Bostic

48 A.D.3d 696, 850 N.Y.S.2d 910
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 19, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 48 A.D.3d 696 (People v. Bostic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bostic, 48 A.D.3d 696, 850 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered December 23, 2003, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in excluding certain evidence on the basis that it was cumulative to evidence that had already been admitted (see People v Ahmr, 22 AD3d 593, 594 [2005] ; People v Ingram, 3 AD3d 437, 438 [2004]; see also People v Petty, 7 NY3d 277, 286-287 [2006]). Consequently, the defendant was not deprived of the opportunity to present a complete defense.

The defendant’s remaining contentions raised in his pro se supplemental brief are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Ritter, J.E, Santucci, Covello and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Legere
81 A.D.3d 746 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.3d 696, 850 N.Y.S.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bostic-nyappdiv-2008.