People v. Bostic
222 A.D.2d 1073, 636 N.Y.S.2d 683
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1995·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666; People v Francis, 38 NY2d 150, 153). (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Purple, Jr., J. — Attempted Forgery, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Bostic, 222 A.D.2d 1073, 636 N.Y.S.2d 683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
222 A.D.2d 1073 (People v. Bostic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DEKENIPP, RICHARD A., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013
LOPEZ, ORLANDO, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Obee
299 A.D.2d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Bates
249 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Peryea
239 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Mikel
237 A.D.2d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Hardgers
222 A.D.2d 1038 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)