Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Bostic

People v. Bostic

188 A.D.2d 1057, 592 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14930
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D.2d 1057 (People v. Bostic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bostic, 188 A.D.2d 1057, 592 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: The People concede that, pursuant to People v Dokes (79 NY2d 656), defendant’s exclusion from the Sandoval hearing mandates reversal and the granting of a new trial. (Appeal from Judgment of Steuben County Court, Purple, Jr., J. — Attempted Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dokes
595 N.E.2d 836 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 A.D.2d 1057, 592 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bostic-nyappdiv-1992.