People v. Bosca

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Bosca

911 N.W.2d 465

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 25, 2018

DocketSC: 151610; COA: 317633

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 911 N.W.2d 465 (People v. Bosca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bosca, 911 N.W.2d 465 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

By order of December 23, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v. Temelkoski (Docket No. 150643). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on January 24, 2018, 501 Mich. 960, 905 N.W.2d 593 (2018), the application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of People v. Tucker (Docket No. 152798) and People v. Snyder (Docket No. 153696) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.

The motion to remand remains pending.

Viviano, J., not participating because he presided over this case in the circuit court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By order of December 23, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the March 26, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v. Temelkoski (Docket No. 150643). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on January 24, 2018, 501 Mich. 960, 905 N.W.2d 593 (2018), the application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of People v. Tucker (Docket No. 152798) and People v. Snyder (Docket No. 153696) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.

The motion to remand remains pending.

Viviano, J., not participating because he presided over this case in the circuit court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

911 N.W.2d 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bosca-mich-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack