People v. Born

California Court of Appeal

People v. Born

137 Cal. App. 770

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 12, 1934

DocketCiv. No. 8615

StatusPublished

This text of 137 Cal. App. 770 (People v. Born) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Born, 137 Cal. App. 770 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The controlling question presented by this appeal, namely, the constitutionality of sections 9 (b), 2 (10), (a), (b), (c) and (e) of chapter 222 of the Laws of 1929 (Workmen’s Compensation Act, Stats. 1929, p. 420), was brought before the District Court of Appeal of the Fourth District, in the case of People v. Standard Oil Co., 132 Cal. App. 563 [23 Pac. (2d) 86], and there decided adversely to appellant’s contentions. Afterwards the Supreme Court denied a petition to have the cause heard in that court. Upon the authority of that case, therefore, and for the reason and upon the grounds stated in the decision therein, the judgment in the present case is affirmed.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on May 10, 1934.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The controlling question presented by this appeal, namely, the constitutionality of sections 9 (b), 2 (10), (a), (b), (c) and (e) of chapter 222 of the Laws of 1929 (Workmen’s Compensation Act, Stats. 1929, p. 420), was brought before the District Court of Appeal of the Fourth District, in the case of People v. Standard Oil Co., 132 Cal. App. 563 [23 Pac. (2d) 86], and there decided adversely to appellant’s contentions. Afterwards the Supreme Court denied a petition to have the cause heard in that court. Upon the authority of that case, therefore, and for the reason and upon the grounds stated in the decision therein, the judgment in the present case is affirmed.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on May 10, 1934.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 Cal. App. 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-born-calctapp-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack