People v. Borg
110 A.D.2d 844, 488 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48748
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The hearing court properly determined that defendant and his wife had voluntarily consented to the searches (see, People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122) and that defendant’s statement to Investigator McKnight after defendant had invoked his right to counsel was admissible as a spontaneous statement (see, People v Rogers, 48 NY2d 167). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Borg, 110 A.D.2d 844, 488 N.Y.S.2d 623, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
110 A.D.2d 844 (People v. Borg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Visich
57 A.D.3d 804 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)