People v. Bordas

226 A.D.2d 261, 641 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3990
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 23, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.), rendered June 5,1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of kidnapping in the first degree, attempted grand larceny in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 20 years to life, 21ls to 7 years and 21h to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

As we previously found on the codefendant’s appeal (People v Mendez, 221 AD2d 162, 163), it was proper in these circumstances for the trial court to have inquired whether the jury, after deliberating for hours, had agreed upon a verdict as to any of the multiple counts submitted, and in then accepting a partial verdict and granting the prosecutor’s motion to dismiss the remaining count.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bordas, 226 A.D.2d 261, 641 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 261 (People v. Bordas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Spears
276 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)