People v. Booth
242 A.D.2d 962, 665 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10585
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1997·Published
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has waived his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Sirkin, J.—Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Booth, 242 A.D.2d 962, 665 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).
242 A.D.2d 962 (People v. Booth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)