People v. Boorsma

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Boorsma

169 N.W.2d 162, 17 Mich. App. 90, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1157

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 22, 1969

DocketDocket No. 5,382

StatusPublished

This text of 169 N.W.2d 162 (People v. Boorsma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Boorsma, 169 N.W.2d 162, 17 Mich. App. 90, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1157 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By his plea of guilty, defendant was convicted of uttering and publishing a forged cheek,

* and he was sentenced. His motion to set aside the plea and for a new trial was denied. His appeal contends, as did his motion just referred to, that the trial court failed to comply with GCE 1963, 785.3(2).

In support of this contention, defendant relies on People v. Atkins (1966), 2 Mich App 199, People v. [91]*91Curtis Lee Williams (1966), 2 Mich App 232, People v. Johnson (1966), 2 Mich App 182, and People v. Smith (1966), 5 Mich App 139. These cases are no longer controlling precedent. See People v. Hobdy (1968), 380 Mich 686, People v. Dunn (1968), 380 Mich 693, People v. Stearns (1968), 380 Mich 704, and People v. Winegar (1968), 380 Mich 719.

A review of the arraignment and sentencing transcripts reveals no error under the standards announced in the cases last cited.

Affirmed.

CL 1948, § 750.249 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.446).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI