People v. Boomer
Opinion
| People v Boomer |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 00908 |
| Decided on February 18, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 18, 2026 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
LARA J. GENOVESI
WILLIAM G. FORD
JANICE A. TAYLOR
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.
2020-04148
(Ind. No. 4203/18)
v
Donavin Boomer, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Raina Hasan of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel; Jordan Najah on the memorandum), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), imposed December 3, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte 90 AD2d 80).
DUFFY, J.P., GENOVESI, FORD, TAYLOR and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2026 NY Slip Op 00908 (People v. Boomer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.