People v. Booker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Booker

2017 NY Slip Op 1379, 147 A.D.3d 1077, 46 N.Y.S.3d 911

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 22, 2017

Docket2015-01736

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1379 (People v. Booker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Booker, 2017 NY Slip Op 1379, 147 A.D.3d 1077, 46 N.Y.S.3d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), rendered January 9, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the County Court should have permitted him to withdraw his plea of guilty or, in the alternative, granted him an adjournment, based on an alleged issue regarding the amount of credit he was to receive for time served in connection with the negotiated sentence, is without merit (see People v Sampson, 30 AD3d 623 [2006]).

Chambers, J.P, Hall, Miller and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), rendered January 9, 2015, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the County Court should have permitted him to withdraw his plea of guilty or, in the alternative, granted him an adjournment, based on an alleged issue regarding the amount of credit he was to receive for time served in connection with the negotiated sentence, is without merit (see People v Sampson, 30 AD3d 623 [2006]).

Chambers, J.P, Hall, Miller and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 1379, 147 A.D.3d 1077, 46 N.Y.S.3d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-booker-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack