People v. Booker

282 A.D.2d 201, 723 N.Y.S.2d 22, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3390
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, [202]*202Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), rendered March 3, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2V3 to 7 years and 1 to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly determined that a deliberating juror distressed by personal problems was not “grossly unqualified” for further service (CPL 270.35 [1]). The juror expressed no doubts about her ability to be fair, and the totality of her responses established that she could render an impartial verdict (see, People v Buford, 69 NY2d 290, 298).

Defendant’s objections to the prosecutor’s summation were sustained and sufficient curative instructions were given by the court to the jury.

We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Booker, 282 A.D.2d 201, 723 N.Y.S.2d 22, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 201 (People v. Booker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Condes
23 A.D.3d 1149 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Booker v. Girdich
262 F. Supp. 2d 264 (S.D. New York, 2003)
People v. Telehany
302 A.D.2d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)