People v. Bonnerwith
This text of 79 Misc. 2d 242 (People v. Bonnerwith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed.
Defendant was not entitled to a jury trial, since the maximum sentence he could receive was six months’ incarceration (Baldwin v. New York, 399 U. S. 66) and there was no basis in fact for defendant’s claim that the Justice below was biased against him.
However, defendant may not be convicted of a zoning violation where he has shown a valid nonconforming use (People v. Miller, 304 N. Y. 105; 2 Rathkoff, Law of Zoning and Planning [3d ed., 1972], p. 58-1), even though there has been a legitimate increase in volume (People v. Perkins, 282 N. Y. 329; Matter of Vella v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Rochester, 206 Misc. 941, 945).
Concur — Hogan, P. J., Pittoni and Parley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 Misc. 2d 242, 360 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1974 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bonnerwith-nyappterm-1974.