People v. Bonnerwith

79 Misc. 2d 242, 360 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1974 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1635
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 22, 1974·Published

Opinion

Memorandum. Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed.

Defendant was not entitled to a jury trial, since the maximum sentence he could receive was six months’ incarceration (Baldwin v. New York, 399 U. S. 66) and there was no basis in fact for defendant’s claim that the Justice below was biased against him.

However, defendant may not be convicted of a zoning violation where he has shown a valid nonconforming use (People v. Miller, 304 N. Y. 105; 2 Rathkoff, Law of Zoning and Planning [3d ed., 1972], p. 58-1), even though there has been a legitimate increase in volume (People v. Perkins, 282 N. Y. 329; Matter of Vella v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Rochester, 206 Misc. 941, 945).

Concur — Hogan, P. J., Pittoni and Parley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bonnerwith, 79 Misc. 2d 242, 360 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1974 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

79 Misc. 2d 242 (People v. Bonnerwith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baldwin v. New York
399 U.S. 66 (Supreme Court, 1970)
People v. Perkins
26 N.E.2d 278 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)
Vella v. City Zoning Board of Appeals
206 Misc. 941 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
People v. Miller
106 N.E.2d 34 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)