People v. Bonino
135 N.E.2d 51, 1 N.Y.2d 752, 152 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 924
Opinions
Upon reargument: Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered in accordance with the following memorandum: Since the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, has held that the writ of habeas corpus must issue to his codefendant Caminito because his confessions were inadmissible, the defendant Bonino should, in the interest of justice, receive a new trial with his (Bonino’s) confessions excluded.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Fttld, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ. Desmond, J., dissents in the following opinion in which Dye and Froessel, JJ., concur:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Bonino, 135 N.E.2d 51, 1 N.Y.2d 752, 152 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1956 N.Y. LEXIS 924 (N.Y. 1956).
135 N.E.2d 51 (People v. Bonino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miranda v. Arizona
384 U.S. 436 (Supreme Court, 1966)
Fay v. Noia
372 U.S. 391 (Supreme Court, 1963)
United States of America Ex Rel. Charles Noia, Relator-Appellant v. Edwin M. Fay, as Warden of Greenhaven Prison, State of New York
300 F.2d 345 (Second Circuit, 1962)
United States Ex Rel. Kiernan v. La Vallee
191 F. Supp. 455 (N.D. New York, 1961)
United States Ex Rel. Noia v. Fay
183 F. Supp. 222 (S.D. New York, 1960)
United States ex rel. Williams v. Lavalle
170 F. Supp. 582 (N.D. New York, 1959)