People v. Bonilla

280 A.D.2d 426, 721 N.Y.S.2d 507, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1930
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bonilla. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 A.D.2d 746

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered October 19, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years and a concurrent term of 1 year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence clearly established that the police observed defendant selling drugs prior to arresting him and finding 12 packets of heroin in his possession.

The record does not establish that defendant’s sentence was based on any improper criteria and we perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bonilla, 280 A.D.2d 426, 721 N.Y.S.2d 507, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

280 A.D.2d 426 (People v. Bonilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.