People v. Bonilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bonilla

200 A.D.2d 369, 606 N.Y.S.2d 201, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 77

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 200 A.D.2d 369 (People v. Bonilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bonilla, 200 A.D.2d 369, 606 N.Y.S.2d 201, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 77 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered February 18, 1992, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of two counts of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.65 [1]) and two counts of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.65 [3]), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to four concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The child victim’s statement to her sister one day after the incident was properly admitted as a "prompt outcry”, under the circumstances, including the child’s age and fear of defendant, who resided in her home (People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10, 17). While the child’s later statement to her mother should not have been admitted as a prompt outcry, there is no significant probability that this evidence, or any of the questions to which objections were sustained, influenced the verdict in this nonjury trial (People v D’Abate, 37 NY2d 922, 923-924). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered February 18, 1992, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of two counts of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.65 [1]) and two counts of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.65 [3]), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to four concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The child victim’s statement to her sister one day after the incident was properly admitted as a "prompt outcry”, under the circumstances, including the child’s age and fear of defendant, who resided in her home (People v McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10, 17). While the child’s later statement to her mother should not have been admitted as a prompt outcry, there is no significant probability that this evidence, or any of the questions to which objections were sustained, influenced the verdict in this nonjury trial (People v D’Abate, 37 NY2d 922, 923-924). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 369, 606 N.Y.S.2d 201, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bonilla-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack