People v. Bondoc-Gutierrez

2020 NY Slip Op 4568, 127 N.Y.S.3d 268, 186 A.D.3d 726
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 19, 2020
DocketInd. No. 10291/13
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 4568 (People v. Bondoc-Gutierrez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bondoc-Gutierrez, 2020 NY Slip Op 4568, 127 N.Y.S.3d 268, 186 A.D.3d 726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

People v Bondoc-Gutierrez (2020 NY Slip Op 04568)
People v Bondoc-Gutierrez
2020 NY Slip Op 04568
Decided on August 19, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 19, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2016-01111
(Ind. No. 10291/13)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Emerlito Bondoc-Gutierrez, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Angad Singh of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Solomon Neubort, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Joseph E. Gubbay, J.), rendered June 9, 2015, convicting him of endangering the welfare of a child, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily because the Supreme Court failed to adequately advise him of the immigration consequences of his plea is unpreserved for appellate review as he failed to raise the issue before the court or move to withdraw his plea (see People v Pastor, 28 NY3d 1089, 1091; People v Peque, 22 NY3d 168, 183; People v Plaza, 178 AD3d 958; People v Gustavo-Cano, 149 AD3d 1100, 1101), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, DUFFY and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Morataya-Mendez
2025 NY Slip Op 06187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 4568, 127 N.Y.S.3d 268, 186 A.D.3d 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bondoc-gutierrez-nyappdiv-2020.