People v. Bonacci

270 A.D.2d 839, 705 N.Y.S.2d 543, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3517

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that certain issues of fact were removed from the jury’s consideration by Supreme Court in its charge is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, any error is harmless (see, People v Brewington, 145 AD2d 962, 963, lv denied 74 NY2d 661; see also, People v Dudley, 201 AD2d 664, lv denied 83 NY2d 871). The facts to which the court referred do not es[840] tablish any element of the crime charged (cf., People v Mason, 219 AD2d 681; People v Creeden, 210 AD2d 422, 424). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Wisner, J. — Criminal Mischief, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bonacci, 270 A.D.2d 839, 705 N.Y.S.2d 543, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

270 A.D.2d 839 (People v. Bonacci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brewington
145 A.D.2d 962 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Dudley
201 A.D.2d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Creeden
210 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Mason
219 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)