People v. Bolden

5 A.D.3d 393, 772 N.Y.S.2d 546
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 1, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 A.D.3d 393 (People v. Bolden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bolden, 5 A.D.3d 393, 772 N.Y.S.2d 546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered March 30, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s arguments regarding prosecutorial misconduct are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, under the circumstances of this case, do not warrant reversal (see People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 401 [1981]; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]). We note, however, that we do not condone such conduct and it should not be repeated. S. Miller, J.P., H. Miller, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bolden
72 A.D.3d 985 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 393, 772 N.Y.S.2d 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bolden-nyappdiv-2004.