People v. Bolden
This text of 115 A.D.2d 323 (People v. Bolden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find that the proof at the Wade hearing was sufficient for the court to find an independent basis for an in-court identification (People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241), even though it is not disputed that the police display of photographs of suspects to the victim in this case was impermissible. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Crowley, J.—robbery, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Pine, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 A.D.2d 323, 496 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bolden-nyappdiv-1985.