People v. Boettner
This text of 50 A.D.2d 1074 (People v. Boettner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We affirm on the opinion at Special Term. We find no authority to support the dicta in People v Haskins (48 AD2d 480) that would depart from the established rule that neither the Fourth nor Fourteenth Amendments proscribe private as opposed to governmental activity in the area of searches made and statements taken in the course of criminal investigative procedures (see People v Gleeson, 36 NY2d 462; People v Horman, 22 NY2d 378). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County convicting defendant of attempted criminal possession of controlled substance, sixth degree.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Simons, Mahoney, Goldman and Del Vecchio, JJ. [80 Misc 2d 3.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 1074, 376 N.Y.S.2d 59, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-boettner-nyappdiv-1975.