People v. Bodrick

2018 NY Slip Op 6552

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: October 3, 2018
• Docket: 2012-09425
• Status: Published

Opinion

People v Bodrick (2018 NY Slip Op 06552)

People v Bodrick

2018 NY Slip Op 06552

Decided on October 3, 2018

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 3, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS, JJ.

2012-09425
(Ind. No. 7455/10)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

David Bodrick, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Masha Siminova on the memorandum), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Elizabeth Foley, J.), imposed September 16, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v Rance, 122 AD3d 949) precludes appellate review of his contention that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive (see People v Cooper, 155 AD3d 766; People v Blas, 120 AD3d 585).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., RIVERA, AUSTIN, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court