People v. Bodden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bodden

191 A.D.2d 448, 596 N.Y.S.2d 698

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 191 A.D.2d 448 (People v. Bodden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bodden, 191 A.D.2d 448, 596 N.Y.S.2d 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), rendered October 30, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court improperly marshaled the evidence in support of the People’s case while failing to mention any evidence in support of the defense case, thereby denying him the right to a fair trial. This issue has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Saunders, 166 AD2d 546, 547), and in any event, we find that the trial court did not unfairly marshal the evidence to the prejudice of the defendant. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), rendered October 30, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the trial court improperly marshaled the evidence in support of the People’s case while failing to mention any evidence in support of the defense case, thereby denying him the right to a fair trial. This issue has not been preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Saunders, 166 AD2d 546, 547), and in any event, we find that the trial court did not unfairly marshal the evidence to the prejudice of the defendant. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 A.D.2d 448, 596 N.Y.S.2d 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bodden-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack