People v. Bobbitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bobbitt

46 A.D.3d 256, 845 N.Y.S.2d 909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.3d 256 (People v. Bobbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bobbitt, 46 A.D.3d 256, 845 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Stolz, J.), rendered August 30, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentences to concurrent terms of 20 years to life, and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentences excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Buckley and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Stolz, J.), rendered August 30, 2005, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of reducing the sentences to concurrent terms of 20 years to life, and otherwise affirmed.

We find the sentences excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Buckley and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.3d 256, 845 N.Y.S.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bobbitt-nyappdiv-2007.