People v. Blue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blue

269 A.D.2d 232, 702 N.Y.S.2d 816, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 269 A.D.2d 232 (People v. Blue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blue, 269 A.D.2d 232, 702 N.Y.S.2d 816, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J., at motion to dismiss; Martin Marcus, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered June 9, 1997, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5V2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant did not, at any time, serve written notice of his intent to testify before the Grand Jury upon the District Attorney’s Office as required by GPL 190,50 (5) (a), defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment was properly denied (People v Clay, 248 AD2d 180, lv denied 92 NY2d 849). The record does not support a waiver by the People. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J., at motion to dismiss; Martin Marcus, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered June 9, 1997, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5V2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant did not, at any time, serve written notice of his intent to testify before the Grand Jury upon the District Attorney’s Office as required by GPL 190,50 (5) (a), defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment was properly denied (People v Clay, 248 AD2d 180, lv denied 92 NY2d 849). The record does not support a waiver by the People. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

269 A.D.2d 232, 702 N.Y.S.2d 816, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blue-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack