People v. Bloom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bloom

286 A.D. 874, 142 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D. 874 (People v. Bloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bloom, 286 A.D. 874, 142 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendants appeal from judgments of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting them of violations of the State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, eh. 274, as amd.) [demanding and receiving rent in excess of the maximum for housing accommodations] and from the sentences that the defendant corporations pay a fine in the sum of $500 in each case, and that the individual defendant serve sixty days in the workhouse. Judgment as to each defendant unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the sentences, which have been reviewed on the appeals from the judgments of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants appeal from judgments of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting them of violations of the State Residential Rent Law (L. 1946, eh. 274, as amd.) [demanding and receiving rent in excess of the maximum for housing accommodations] and from the sentences that the defendant corporations pay a fine in the sum of $500 in each case, and that the individual defendant serve sixty days in the workhouse. Judgment as to each defendant unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the sentences, which have been reviewed on the appeals from the judgments of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D. 874, 142 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bloom-nyappdiv-1955.