People v. Blies

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blies

249 A.D.2d 983, 671 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5140

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D.2d 983 (People v. Blies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blies, 249 A.D.2d 983, 671 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 155.35), criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law § 145.05) and possession of burglar’s tools (Penal Law § 140.35). We reject the argument of defendant that his warrantless arrest was without probable cause (see, People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181, 190-192). The verdict is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We have examined the remaining issue raised by defendant and conclude that it is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — Attempted Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of attempted grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 155.35), criminal mischief in the third degree (Penal Law § 145.05) and possession of burglar’s tools (Penal Law § 140.35). We reject the argument of defendant that his warrantless arrest was without probable cause (see, People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181, 190-192). The verdict is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). We have examined the remaining issue raised by defendant and conclude that it is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Rogowski, J. — Attempted Grand Larceny, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Pigott, Jr., Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 983, 671 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blies-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack