People v. Blaylock
This text of 125 A.D.3d 950 (People v. Blaylock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Delligatti, J.), dated August 1, 2013, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in considering a 1977 conviction of robbery in the first degree in connection with the assessment of 30 points under risk factor nine (number and nature of prior crimes) is without merit (see People v Seals, 112 AD3d 803 [2013]; People v Camacho, 35 AD3d 424 [2006]; People v Sinclair, 23 AD3d 537 [2005]).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are also without merit.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the appellant a level two sexually violent offender. Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 A.D.3d 950, 1 N.Y.S.3d 868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blaylock-nyappdiv-2015.