People v. Blatchford
This text of 165 N.Y.S.3d 920 (People v. Blatchford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Blatchford |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 03147 |
| Decided on May 12, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Third Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided and Entered:May 12, 2022
110609
v
Edward J. Blatchford, Appellant.
Calendar Date:April 15, 2022
Before:Garry, P.J., Clark, Colangelo, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ.
G. Scott Walling, Slingerlands, for appellant.
Michael A. Korchak, District Attorney, Binghamton (Rita M. Basile of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Dooley, J.), rendered July 3, 2018, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
In satisfaction of seven drug-related charges, including criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, defendant waived indictment, agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information and pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Pursuant to the plea agreement, which required a waiver of appeal, defendant was sentenced, as an acknowledged second felony offender, to a prison term of three years to be followed by two years of postrelease supervision.[FN1] Defendant appeals.
Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).
Garry, P.J., Clark, Colangelo, Ceresia and Fisher, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
Footnote 1: Defendant served his prison sentence and was released from parole supervision in November 2020.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 N.Y.S.3d 920, 205 A.D.3d 1142, 2022 NY Slip Op 03147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blatchford-nyappdiv-2022.