People v. Blaszyk

183 N.Y.S.3d 923, 2023 NY Slip Op 01414
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 17, 2023
Docket220 KA 20-01634
StatusPublished

This text of 183 N.Y.S.3d 923 (People v. Blaszyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Blaszyk, 183 N.Y.S.3d 923, 2023 NY Slip Op 01414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Blaszyk (2023 NY Slip Op 01414)
People v Blaszyk
2023 NY Slip Op 01414
Decided on March 17, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 17, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, OGDEN, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.

220 KA 20-01634

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

ROBERT BLASZYK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ABIGAIL D. WHIPPLE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN J. FLYNN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (James A.W. McLeod, A.J.), rendered May 28, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.50 [2]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant's waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and thus does not preclude our review of his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Seay, 201 AD3d 1361, 1361-1362 [4th Dept 2022]), we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Contrary to defendant's further contention, we conclude that there is no basis on which to modify the duration of the order of protection issued by County Court on behalf of the victim.

Entered: March 17, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Seay
201 A.D.3d 1361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 N.Y.S.3d 923, 2023 NY Slip Op 01414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blaszyk-nyappdiv-2023.