People v. Blasucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blasucci

69 A.D.2d 822, 414 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11475

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.2d 822 (People v. Blasucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blasucci, 69 A.D.2d 822, 414 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11475 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence 'of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed September 26, 1978, upon his conviction of criminally negligent homicide, on his plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite prison term of one year. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a period of imprisonment of 60 days and probation for an additional 4 years and 10 months. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence 'of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed September 26, 1978, upon his conviction of criminally negligent homicide, on his plea of guilty, the sentence being a definite prison term of one year. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a period of imprisonment of 60 days and probation for an additional 4 years and 10 months. As so modified, sentence affirmed and case remitted to the County Court to fix the terms and conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 822, 414 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blasucci-nyappdiv-1979.