People v. Blasingame

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blasingame

202 A.D.2d 684, 612 N.Y.S.2d 874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 684 (People v. Blasingame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blasingame, 202 A.D.2d 684, 612 N.Y.S.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), imposed December 3, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain. Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), imposed December 3, 1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain. Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 684, 612 N.Y.S.2d 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blasingame-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack