People v. Blanding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blanding

279 A.D.2d 288, 718 N.Y.S.2d 822, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 238

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 288 (People v. Blanding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blanding, 279 A.D.2d 288, 718 N.Y.S.2d 822, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered October 29, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

After affording defendant sufficient opportunity to be heard, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record reveals that defendant’s plea was made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily, and that defendant’s conclusory claim of innocence with respect to the element of intent to benefit himself was contradicted by the statements he made during the thorough plea allocution. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered October 29, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to a term of IV2 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

After affording defendant sufficient opportunity to be heard, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The record reveals that defendant’s plea was made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily, and that defendant’s conclusory claim of innocence with respect to the element of intent to benefit himself was contradicted by the statements he made during the thorough plea allocution. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 288, 718 N.Y.S.2d 822, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blanding-nyappdiv-2001.