People v. Blanco

188 N.Y.S.3d 71, 216 A.D.3d 599, 2023 NY Slip Op 02851
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 30, 2023
DocketInd. No. 1928/94 Appeal No. 335 Case No. 2016-1358
StatusPublished

This text of 188 N.Y.S.3d 71 (People v. Blanco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Blanco, 188 N.Y.S.3d 71, 216 A.D.3d 599, 2023 NY Slip Op 02851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Blanco (2023 NY Slip Op 02851)
People v Blanco
2023 NY Slip Op 02851
Decided on May 30, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 30, 2023
Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Ind. No. 1928/94 Appeal No. 335 Case No. 2016-1358

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Jose Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Natalie Rea of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Elliott R. Hamilton of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven L. Barrett, J.), entered on or about September 24, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). We do not find any overassessment of points, and the alleged mitigating factors cited by defendant, including his family situation, were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by egregiousness of the underlying offense,

which indicates a danger that a reoffense would cause a high degree of harm.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 30, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 N.Y.S.3d 71, 216 A.D.3d 599, 2023 NY Slip Op 02851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blanco-nyappdiv-2023.