People v. Blanco

151 A.D.2d 1036, 544 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393

This text of 151 A.D.2d 1036 (People v. Blanco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Blanco, 151 A.D.2d 1036, 544 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no error in the court’s conclusion that pretrial identification procedures were not unduly suggestive. Furthermore, the verdict of the jury is clearly supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence as defendant argues (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490).

We have reviewed defendant’s other arguments raised on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Chautauqua County Court, Adams, J. — robbery, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 A.D.2d 1036, 544 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blanco-nyappdiv-1989.