People v. Blanchard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blanchard

280 A.D. 1027, 116 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4596

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1952

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 1027 (People v. Blanchard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blanchard, 280 A.D. 1027, 116 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by plaintiff from a summary judgment entered in Supreme Court, Fulton County, in favor of defendant in Action No. 1, from an order denying plaintiff's cross motion of similar relief and from collateral orders relating thereto. The actions are in ejectment. In Action No. I, the State claims title to certain Adirondack lands which have been occupied by defendant and his predecessors for many years. Defendant also asserts title. The judgment appealed from recites the facts in detail and recites the long history of this litigation. The record supports the judgment. The orders and judgment are affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondent in Action No. 1. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., taking no pai’t. [See 281 App. Div. 786.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by plaintiff from a summary judgment entered in Supreme Court, Fulton County, in favor of defendant in Action No. 1, from an order denying plaintiff's cross motion of similar relief and from collateral orders relating thereto. The actions are in ejectment. In Action No. I, the State claims title to certain Adirondack lands which have been occupied by defendant and his predecessors for many years. Defendant also asserts title. The judgment appealed from recites the facts in detail and recites the long history of this litigation. The record supports the judgment. The orders and judgment are affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondent in Action No. 1. Foster, P. J., Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., taking no pai’t. [See 281 App. Div. 786.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 A.D. 1027, 116 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blanchard-nyappdiv-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack