People v. Blancero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Blancero

289 A.D.2d 501, 736 N.Y.S.2d 50, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 289 A.D.2d 501 (People v. Blancero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Blancero, 289 A.D.2d 501, 736 N.Y.S.2d 50, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), dated March 29, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on statutory speedy trial grounds.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The fact that this case involved a retrial following an earlier conviction does not relieve the People from compliance with the “statement of readiness” rule (see, People v Contrearas, 227 AD2d 907; People v Passero, 96 AD2d 721).

The decision and order of this Court directing a new trial (People v Blancero, 240 AD2d 754) became final after the Court of Appeals dismissed the People’s appeal (91 NY2d 912) and denied the People’s motion to reargue the denial (91 NY2d 1003). Since the People failed to reannounce their readiness for trial within the statutorily-prescribed period (see, CPL 30.30 [1] [a], [b]; [5]) that commenced when the decision and order of this Court became final, the indictment must be dismissed (see, People v Wilson, 86 NY2d 753; People v Weaver, 162 AD2d 486). Altman, J. P., Smith, Adams and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), dated March 29, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on statutory speedy trial grounds.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The fact that this case involved a retrial following an earlier conviction does not relieve the People from compliance with the “statement of readiness” rule (see, People v Contrearas, 227 AD2d 907; People v Passero, 96 AD2d 721).

The decision and order of this Court directing a new trial (People v Blancero, 240 AD2d 754) became final after the Court of Appeals dismissed the People’s appeal (91 NY2d 912) and denied the People’s motion to reargue the denial (91 NY2d 1003). Since the People failed to reannounce their readiness for trial within the statutorily-prescribed period (see, CPL 30.30 [1] [a], [b]; [5]) that commenced when the decision and order of this Court became final, the indictment must be dismissed (see, People v Wilson, 86 NY2d 753; People v Weaver, 162 AD2d 486). Altman, J. P., Smith, Adams and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 A.D.2d 501, 736 N.Y.S.2d 50, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-blancero-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack